<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Justice Hillary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelsiegel.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=869" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=869</link>
	<description>Missing Sleep Since June 2007 (Blogging Since 2005)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=869&#038;cpage=1#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=869#comment-784</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right, Robert.  Rush Limbaugh pointed out the other day that at least half the news these days is speculation about what might happen.  You&#039;d think there was nothing going on in the world *right now*.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right, Robert.  Rush Limbaugh pointed out the other day that at least half the news these days is speculation about what might happen.  You&#8217;d think there was nothing going on in the world *right now*.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpl</title>
		<link>http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=869&#038;cpage=1#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>rpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 10:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=869#comment-783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suspect it&#039;s more a result of a news media that has grown so comfortable (i.e., lazy) reporting the &quot;Barack and Hillary Show&quot; that they no longer know how to report on anything  else.  Hillary Clinton is an even less plausible choice than Harriet Meiers; she has none of the credentials normally expected of a supreme court nominee.  This rumor (which I had never even heard before I read it here) is just noise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suspect it&#8217;s more a result of a news media that has grown so comfortable (i.e., lazy) reporting the &#8220;Barack and Hillary Show&#8221; that they no longer know how to report on anything  else.  Hillary Clinton is an even less plausible choice than Harriet Meiers; she has none of the credentials normally expected of a supreme court nominee.  This rumor (which I had never even heard before I read it here) is just noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
