<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bias</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaelsiegel.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=961" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=961</link>
	<description>Missing Sleep Since June 2007 (Blogging Since 2005)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 16:22:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=961&#038;cpage=1#comment-818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 19:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=961#comment-818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No.  I don&#039;t believe it&#039;s entirely reason.  And I didn&#039;t make this clear in my original posting.  My oblique statement about &quot;patterns in voting with age and wealth&quot; was supposed to reference how people&#039;s notions change based ons tatus.

But I *do* think the shorter-term examples, such as the sea change in the nation&#039;s attitude toward slavery or civil rights (or capitalism in the 80&#039;s), does show that people&#039;s minds can be changed.  It takes oceans of patience and hard work.  But it can be done.  We&#039;re seeing that now as the nations rapidly shifts its attitudes on gays.  It&#039;s happening far too quickly to represent a swap of prejudices.

But the broader point is correct.  Once people shift their attitudes, they then become very stubborn in their holding onto the new ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  I don&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s entirely reason.  And I didn&#8217;t make this clear in my original posting.  My oblique statement about &#8220;patterns in voting with age and wealth&#8221; was supposed to reference how people&#8217;s notions change based ons tatus.</p>
<p>But I *do* think the shorter-term examples, such as the sea change in the nation&#8217;s attitude toward slavery or civil rights (or capitalism in the 80&#8242;s), does show that people&#8217;s minds can be changed.  It takes oceans of patience and hard work.  But it can be done.  We&#8217;re seeing that now as the nations rapidly shifts its attitudes on gays.  It&#8217;s happening far too quickly to represent a swap of prejudices.</p>
<p>But the broader point is correct.  Once people shift their attitudes, they then become very stubborn in their holding onto the new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rpl</title>
		<link>http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=961&#038;cpage=1#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>rpl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaelsiegel.net/?p=961#comment-817</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike,

You attribute people&#039;s beliefs changing with time to the influence of reason.  How do you know that they aren&#039;t simply exchanging one set of prejudices for another or accumulating new prejudices?  If your hypothesis is correct, then we should see a trend with age toward more reason-based political beliefs.  The oldest among us should therefore be among the best articulators of the reasons behind their political thinking.  Is this the case in your experience?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>You attribute people&#8217;s beliefs changing with time to the influence of reason.  How do you know that they aren&#8217;t simply exchanging one set of prejudices for another or accumulating new prejudices?  If your hypothesis is correct, then we should see a trend with age toward more reason-based political beliefs.  The oldest among us should therefore be among the best articulators of the reasons behind their political thinking.  Is this the case in your experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
