Neal Boortz:<\/p>\n
How long was it going to take before a Defeatocrat came up with this one? John Murtha\u00e2\u20ac\u201dour favorite moonbat from Pennsylvania\u00e2\u20ac\u201dsays that the terrorists arrested in the JFK plot were a product of the war in Iraq. Basically, if we had not gone into Iraq, this terrorist plot would never have come about. He is the boat with 9\/11 conspiracy theorists and all those who sympathize with “freedom fighters” and the “peaceful” religion of Islam.<\/p>\n
What has this man been smoking? If this was the excuse for the JFK plot, than who does he blame the 9\/11 attacks on? He does not understand that the fundamental hatred of terrorists is not based on our presence in Iraq.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
This is a complete non-sequitur. Murtha may be right or wrong. But the concept of “blowback” does not in any way support 9\/11 conspiracy theories or provide comfort to terrorists. It’s a simple fucking fact<\/em>. (And you thought fatherhood would make me lighten up.)<\/p>\n
Have conservatives even read<\/em> the 9\/11 report? Being aware of blowback doesn’t automatically mean you’re even against the War in Iraq, least of all against the War on Terror. Blowback can be worth it — blowback can be a cost of war, just like dead American soldiers is a cost of war.<\/p>\n
But to sit around and pretend that blowback doesn’t exist? To be frank, Boortz, that’s First Rank Moonbatism.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Neal Boortz: How long was it going to take before a Defeatocrat came up with this one? John Murtha\u00e2\u20ac\u201dour favorite moonbat from Pennsylvania\u00e2\u20ac\u201dsays that the terrorists arrested in the JFK plot were a product of the war in Iraq. Basically, if we had not gone into Iraq, this terrorist plot would never have come about. … Continue reading Boortz Pops a Rivet<\/span>