I noticed the hatchet job the NYT did on Vioxx a couple of weeks ago, made a not to comment on it and forgot. Well, Point of Law does the job for me.

So the NYT write a poorly informed Page 1 article castigating the eevil Merck is dragging its feet paying out people who can’t actually prove that they had heart attacks because of Vioxx. No, no bias there. Move along. Nothing to see.

Comments are closed.