Category Archives: Politics

Tuesday Morning Linkorama

  • War of the Worlds in reverse. Are our landers killing the very life they are trying to find?
  • The destruction of federalism continues apace. As part of cap and trade, the Feds may impose building codes. This will work out just fine. The building codes appropriate for Alaska are obviously appropriate for Florida. Right?
  • An anonymous blogger gets outed for honking off one of the neocons. NIce. Makes me want to just give up blogging. A look at the potential consequences here.
  • George Will on the Gm debacle. Brilliant, as always.
  • Friday Linkorama

  • Homeless man shines shoes to lift himself out of the gutter. Bureaucrat reads about it in paper. You know what happens next.
  • The economic stimulus is making states fight over the scraps from the government table. Charming.
  • The IRS wants to license tax preparers. I might be prepared to countenance this if the IRS could fill out tax forms correctly.
  • The city of Austin, never one to pass up an opportunity or stupid feelgoodism, mandates energy audits for new home sales. ‘Cuz, you know, the home market is too brisk right now.
  • The GOP has decided that the only reason they are losing is media bias. Apparently having no ideas and thoroughly betraying everything about conservatism isn’t their problem.
  • Tuesday Linkorama

    Sorry, there’s a lot of good stuff on the tubes:

  • The WSJ on empathy. The reason we have laws and a Constitution is precisely so that people don’t make decisions based on emotion — which is an unreliable guide at best.
  • Obama and the Democrats are contemplating an outrageous expansion of federal discretionary power. Kudo to Greenwald for not selling out to the Hope and Change Express.
  • Why does Bill Kristol still get media appearances? He’s a disgrace. He’s just wrong about everything. If a blogger were as wildly ignorant as Kristol is, his traffic would crater.
  • Sweeeet. Taxpayers are auditing school districts — and finding millions in waste. That’s change we can believe in.
  • Isn’t this sort of thing how we got an economic crisis in the first place?
  • Lithwick defends Clarence Thomas. The meme in liberal circles that Thomas is an idiot puppet of Scalia is one of the most ignorant — and quietly racist — of the movement. The thinking seems to be that since he’s black and not liberal, he must be a moron.
  • The reality of child soldiers.
  • Weekend Linkorama

  • No, Virginia, Prop 13 and other tax revolts did not bankrupt California. I swear. What is it with liberals with coming out with pre-planned and wrong explanations for whatever has been screwed up? Conservative aren’t much better these days, of course, blaming the housing crash on the CRA. But “disaster socialism” is alive and well.
  • Someone actually checks to see if Sotomayor is the race warrior every Right Wing dunderhead is making her out to be. Hint: she isn’t.
  • Why David Petraeus rocks. I defy the Right to tell me that he is some weak-kneed liberal who wants the terrorists to win.
  • Just a peek into what constitutes “professional development” for teachers. And people wonder why I’m not friendly to the unions.
  • More information on the terrorist who murdered an abortion doctor yesterday. Despite the ugliness of the rhetoric (there’s a horrific video I refuse to link to) I remain firm in my conviction that the only man responsible for the killing is the killer. While I am pro-choice, I don’t believe that pro-lifers should be quiet about what they earnestly believe is the taking of hundreds of thousands of lives a year. I would, however, prefer to see rhetoric toned down a bit and the focus shifted away from individual doctors to the larger political and moral issue.
  • What’s Old Is New

    Brink Lindsey eviscerates the notion that our economy was so much better back in the old days when workers had good union jobs and there weren’t so many rich people.

    The Treaty of Detroit was built on extensive cartelization of markets, limiting competition to favor producers over consumers. The restrictions on competition were buttressed by racial prejudice, sexual discrimination, and postwar conformism, which combined to limit the choices available to workers and potential workers alike. Those illiberal social norms were finally swept aside in the cultural tumults of the 1960s and ’70s. And then, in the 1970s and ’80s, restraints on competition were substantially reduced as well, to the applause of economists across the ideological spectrum. At least until now.

    I don’t understand the thinking that says we can go back to an economic system built on racism, sexism and monopolies without the racism, sexism and monopolies. The reason union jobs were so good was because women and minorities were kept out, most other countries were dirt poor and the companies were gouging the shit out of the consumer. Without those things, no company could afford such ridiculous pensions as the Big Three have. And indeed, they can’t.

    The Big Union jobs were completely dependent on having no imports, little domestic competition (thanks to high marginal tax rates) and no foreign competition — which is why they’ve been in a slow 30-year freefall. Unless we’re planning to unleash an airborne strain of ebola on China and India, that isn’t going to change back. Ever. And that’s a good thing. Especially if you’re Chinese or Indian but even if you’re an American.

    Read the whole thing.

    Wednesday Night Linkorama

  • If you want to know why California is in such dire financial straits, here’s why. They’re spending $100 million to reinflate the housing bubble.
  • I’ll say one thing about a VAT. It’s massively preferable to the existing system. Or the stupid Fair Tax.
  • Just great. One more reason to hate ethanol. IT ruins engines.
  • It is a fair point. The only personal freedom the left really believes in is sexual freedom. All other rights can hang (until Obama stops indefinite detentions, I’m not letting the Dems claim to be better on civil liberties).
  • Climb Every Mountain

    A great post at the Atlantic gets into the heads of the mountain climber who scale Everest at great personal risk.

    Ever since reading Into Thin Air, I’ve had a fascination with the idea of scaling everest. I would never do it — I’m 37 and out of shape — and I just know I would take a wrong turn or something and spend the last few moments of my life running out of air and miserably wishing I could unmake the decision to climb while kicking myself for doing something so dumb.

    But it still fascinates me. The extremes of human endeavor always do.